Send email for updates


About updates
Research analysis

This entry is our analysis of a study added to the Effectiveness Bank. The original study was not published by Findings; click Title to order a copy. Free reprints may be available from the authors – click prepared e-mail. Links to other documents. Hover over for notes. Click to highlight passage referred to. Unfold extra text Unfold supplementary text The Summary conveys the findings and views expressed in the study. Below is a commentary from Drug and Alcohol Findings.

Title and link for copying Comment/query to editor

Onsite QTc interval screening for patients in methadone maintenance treatment.

Fareed A., Vayalapalli S., Byrd-Sellers J. et al.
Journal of Addictive Diseases: 2010, 29(1), p. 15–22.
Unable to obtain a copy by clicking title? Try asking the author for a reprint by adapting this prepared e-mail or by writing to Dr Fareed at ayman.fareed@va.gov. You could also try this alternative source.

Does the small risk of fatal heart attack potentially posed by methadone justify routine electrocardiogram screening of patients, or will this cause more deaths by limiting an effective treatment for opiate addiction? A US clinic tried it and found three at-risk patients in three years.

Summary The QTc interval is an indicator of heart function derived from electrocardiogram measures. It refers to the delay between two phases of the electrical activity of the heart which drives it in pumping blood round the body. Extended intervals may lead to torsades de pointes, a potentially life threatening heart attack. Several studies have reported that methadone may contribute to the elongation of this interval, heightening the risk. The risk threshold has been variously set at 450ms (0.45 seconds) for men and 470ms for women or 450ms for both, though it is generally accepted that intervals greater than 500ms constitute a significant risk of abnormal heart function.

Given the risk, an expert US panel recommended electrocardiogram screening of all methadone patients when they start treatment and then a month and a year later, with extra tests as indicated.

A medical clinic for former US military personnel instigated such screening at the clinic itself to identify high risk patients. Alongside it offered brief on-site counselling for patients about the risks of cardiac arrhythmias associated with methadone and how to spot the symptoms of any impending problems. Electrocardiogram results were reviewed by the clinic's psychiatrist, who provided feedback for each patient and arranged for appropriate referrals as needed. Patients with automated readings between 450ms and 500ms received more education and further electrocardiogram monitoring. If the interval reading exceeded 500ms, methadone dose was reduced and the patient was referred to a cardiology clinic.

The featured article reports on the feasibility and effectiveness of these procedures instigated in 2007 based on the records of 55 patients treated between 2002 and 2009 who were among the clinic's established caseload and had been retained in methadone treatment for at least six months and not dropped out. These patients averaged 90mg methadone daily.

Main findings

Urine drug screens revealed that illicit opiate and cocaine use fell during treatment, until just 4–5% of the latest tests were positive for each drug. All but 5% of patients underwent electrocardiogram screening as intended at admission and annually. At baseline the QTc interval averaged 417ms but increased to 442ms at the latest test, a statistically significant prolongation. Two thirds of the patients registered a significant prolongation but remained below 450ms. Another 27% ended up between 450ms and 500ms while just 6% experienced a statistically significant QTc prolongation which ended by exceeding 500ms. No patient was required as a result to discontinue methadone.

Statistical tests were used to determine whether QTc prolongation was significantly related to methadone dose, duration in treatment, whether the patient smoked, concomitant use of antidepressants and antipsychotics, or cocaine use either at baseline or recently. Of these, only recent cocaine use was significantly related to QTc prolongation, both when each variable was tested one by one and when all were taken in to account at the same time.

The authors' conclusions

This study confirms that methadone is a safe and effective treatment for opiate dependence. Although other factors such as continued illicit drug use, hepatitis C, HIV and smoking are much more likely to lead to premature death in methadone patients than cardiac arrhythmias, QTc prolongation in addition to other chronic medical conditions may increase the risk. An electrocardiogram is an objective tool to identify patients at risk for cardiac arrhythmias. Although such screening itself is not expensive, referral to specialty care could be, but in practice providing on-site electrocardiogram screening with a focus on patient education and limiting referral to cardiology specialty care led over a three-year period to just three of 55 patients being referred.

Two thirds of retained patients in the clinic had QTc intervals within the normal range and only three of 55 exhibited significantly increased risk for torsades de pointes with a QTc of over 500ms. Interventions initiated by the addictions clinic included methadone dose reduction, elimination or reduction of other QTc-prolonging medications, education about the possible contributions of caffeine and nicotine to QTc prolongation, and detailed information about the signs and symptoms of arrhythmias.

The key finding in this study was that recent but not baseline use of cocaine among methadone patients – meaning that even when established in treatment these patients had continued with its use – was associated with QTc prolongation.


Findings logo commentary Whether the so far largely theoretical and circumstantial risk of death from torsades de pointes due to methadone's effects justifies routine and repeated electrocardiogram screening of all patients is a matter of some contention. The expert panel convened by the US government whose initial recommendations prompted the featured study later changed its mind, due largely to concern that this might on balance cause more deaths by limiting an effective treatment for opiate addiction. It could mean delays as patients await electrocardiogram testing and results, divert resources from methadone treatment, lead some patients to reject or drop out of methadone treatment, or to sub-optimal doses, all of which could lead to preventable deaths. Faced with these risks the panel opted for screening high risk patients only. However, this could mean still having to screen most patients, as a UK study demonstrated.

In line with the featured study's findings, the latest report of the US expert panel noted that cocaine use seems to aggravate any impact of methadone on the QT interval. Laboratory studies have shown that in its own right cocaine has a marked impact on the QT interval. Such findings justify including use of the drug among the variables indicating high risk among methadone patients, one of the reasons why in parts of Britain so many would qualify for this designation.

High methadone doses are thought to heighten the cardiac risk but also protect against potentially fatal illicit opiate use. In this respect it would have been useful if the featured report had been able to record the consequences of the cautionary dose reductions it implemented among the sampled patients, especially whether urine screens indicated increased illicit drug use after methadone was reduced. Also of interest is whether these or other initiatives implemented as part of the described programme led any patients to refuse or drop out of treatment (in which case they would not have been among the sample reported on), or to be offered or insist on a lower than optimal dose.

See this Findings analysis of the US panel's latest report for more on the risk of death due to methadone-provoked QT prolongation, on whether universal electrocardiogram screening is advisable given the size of this risk and the possible unintended consequences of requiring such screening, and on UK guidance.

Thanks for their comments on this entry in draft to Ayman Fareed of the Atlanta Veterans' Affairs medical service and Emory University School of Medicine in the USA. Commentators bear no responsibility for the text including the interpretations and any remaining errors.

Last revised 17 July 2012. First uploaded 12 July 2012

Comment/query to editor
Give us your feedback on the site (one-minute survey)
Open Effectiveness Bank home page
Add your name to the mailing list to be alerted to new studies and other site updates


Top 10 most closely related documents on this site. For more try a subject or free text search

STUDY 2011 Methadone maintenance, QTc and torsade de pointes: who needs an electrocardiogram and what is the prevalence of QTc prolongation?

REVIEW 2011 QT interval screening in methadone maintenance treatment: report of a SAMHSA expert panel

REVIEW 2012 BAP updated guidelines: evidence-based guidelines for the pharmacological management of substance abuse, harmful use, addiction and comorbidity: recommendations from BAP

STUDY 2012 Randomized trial of standard methadone treatment compared to initiating methadone without counseling: 12-month findings

STUDY 2005 Addressing medical and welfare needs improves treatment retention and outcomes

REVIEW 2010 Gender issues in the pharmacotherapy of opioid-addicted women: Buprenorphine

DOCUMENT 2014 Consolidated guidelines on HIV prevention, diagnosis, treatment and care for key populations

REVIEW 2008 Treating pregnant women dependent on opioids is not the same as treating pregnancy and opioid dependence: a knowledge synthesis for better treatment for women and neonates

STUDY 2010 Effect of motivational interviewing on reduction of alcohol use

STUDY 2015 Risk of mortality on and off methadone substitution treatment in primary care: a national cohort study