Send email for updates


About updates
Research analysis

This entry is our analysis of a study added to the Effectiveness Bank. The original study was not published by Findings; click Title to order a copy. Free reprints may be available from the authors – click prepared e-mail. Links to other documents. Hover over for notes. Click to highlight passage referred to. Unfold extra text Unfold supplementary text The Summary conveys the findings and views expressed in the study.

Title and link for copying Comment/query to editor

An in-depth survey of the screening and assessment practices of highly regarded adolescent substance abuse treatment programs.

Gans J., Falco M., Schackman B.R. et al.
Journal of Child and Adolescent Substance Abuse: 2010, 19(1), p. 33–47.
Unable to obtain a copy by clicking title? Try asking the author for a reprint by adapting this prepared e-mail or by writing to Dr Falco at dspolicy@gmail.com. You could also try this alternative source.

US substance use treatment programmes for adolescents which had been recommended by experts were nevertheless highly variable and inconsistent in the quality of their screening and assessment of the substance use, family circumstances and mental health of their patients.

Summary Aims To examine the quality of screening and assessment practices at some of the most highly regarded adolescent substance use treatment programmes in the United States.

Methods Between March and September 2005, telephone surveys were administered to directors of highly regarded programmes. Several different publications and databases were then used to measure the quality of the screening and assessment instruments described by programmes.

Results For the 120 programmes responding, 77 distinctly named instruments developed by outside sources were used at some point in the screening and assessment process, and the majority of programmes also used instruments developed in-house. Fewer than half of these instruments were mentioned in the Substance Use Screening & Assessment Instruments Database. We were able to confirm that 87% of the instruments developed by others have a published manual, and 74% have been described in an article appearing in a peer-reviewed publication. Sixty-two percent were designed to be used with adolescents or adults and adolescents, while 19% were designed for adults only.

Conclusion Although adolescent substance abuse treatment programmes recognised the importance of screening and assessment, the quality of such practices varied significantly. A large number of different tools were used by some of the most highly regarded programmes in the country, and many used questionnaires developed in-house that may not have had high standards of reliability and validity. Furthermore, numerous programmes were using assessment instruments that were not uniquely designed for adolescents. Encouraging the adoption of standardised assessment practices would help those involved in treatment to evaluate programmes and to understand the assessment process.

Last revised 20 December 2010

Comment/query to editor
Give us your feedback on the site (one-minute survey)
Open Effectiveness Bank home page
Add your name to the mailing list to be alerted to new studies and other site updates


Top 10 most closely related documents on this site. For more try a subject or free text search

DOCUMENT 2012 Practice standards for young people with substance misuse problems

REVIEW 2011 Evidence-based therapy relationships: research conclusions and clinical practices

REVIEW 2006 Motivational arm twisting: contradiction in terms?

DOCUMENT 2009 Management of cannabis use disorder and related issues: a clinician’s guide

DOCUMENT 2012 Substance misuse among young people 2011–12

DOCUMENT 2011 Substance misuse among young people: 2010–11

REVIEW 2011 Alcohol-use disorders: diagnosis, assessment and management of harmful drinking and alcohol dependence

STUDY 2009 Therapist behavior as a predictor of black and white caregiver responsiveness in multisystemic therapy

STUDY 2009 Multidimensional Family Therapy for young adolescent substance abuse: twelve-month outcomes of a randomized controlled trial

REVIEW 2012 BAP updated guidelines: evidence-based guidelines for the pharmacological management of substance abuse, harmful use, addiction and comorbidity: recommendations from BAP