Send email for updates


About updates
Research abstract

This entry is for a study added to the Effectiveness Bank but not (or not yet) fully analysed. Usually the entry consists only of the reference and if available the original abstract with no comments or material changes. The original study was not published by Findings; click Title to order acopy. Free reprints may be available from the authors – click prepared e-mail. Links to other documents. Hover over for notes. Click to highlight passage referred to. Unfold extra text Unfold supplementary text

Title and link for copying Comment/query to editor

Identification of smokers, drinkers and risky drinkers by general practitioners.

Manthey J., Probst C., Hanschmidt F. et al.
Drug and Alcohol Dependence: 2015, 154, p. 93–99.
Unable to obtain a copy by clicking title? Try asking the author for a reprint by adapting this prepared e-mail or by writing to Dr Manthey at jakobmanthey@snappyquest.org. You could also try this alternative source.

Across six European countries, during normal consultations primary care doctors correctly identified 65% of their adult patients as current drinkers, and diagnosed as problem drinkers under a third of those whose responses during interviews with researchers were indicative of risky drinking.

Summary Identification of risky substance users by general practitioners (GPs) is important for providing brief interventions or to refer cases to specialised care, but detection rates of risky users are low, and drinkers are identified less frequently than smokers.

The featured study compared assessments by GPs of patients seen during normal primary care practice against the results of research interviews with the same patients. The assessments included tobacco use, number of cigarettes smoked daily, alcohol use, alcohol use disorder, and whether the patient met several criteria for risky drinking. The study involved 358 GPs and 8476 adult primary care patients in Germany, Hungary, Italy, Latvia, Poland, and Spain.

GPs correctly identified 88% of the smokers among their patients but only 65% of the current drinkers, and for 1 in 9 patients declared themselves unable to say whether they were a drinker. GPs’ estimates of the number of cigarettes smoked daily were slightly lower than those of the patients themselves, but the more the patient said they smoked, the higher the GPs’ estimates tended to be. Just 29% of the risky drinkers (alcohol-related problems or risky drinking patterns) identified through research interviews were seen by their GPs as having a drink problem. Conversely, of those patients judged to be problem drinkers by their GPs, less than half reported at least one problem themselves and even fewer admitted to researchers to being heavy drinkers. Patients with health problems due to drinking were much more likely to be identified by their GPs as problem drinkers.

The authors concluded that GPs in the study were better at identifying smokers than drinkers. They failed to diagnose a sizeable proportion of risky drinkers, but were able to detect other drinkers missed by research interviews. European GPs seem to identify risky drinkers mostly via alcohol-related health problems, but other risky drinkers, such as patients predominantly with psychological problems, may be overlooked by current diagnostic routines.

Last revised 12 October 2015. First uploaded 08 October 2015

Comment/query to editor
Give us your feedback on the site (one-minute survey)
Open Effectiveness Bank home page
Add your name to the mailing list to be alerted to new studies and other site updates


Top 10 most closely related documents on this site. For more try a subject or free text search

DOCUMENT 2015 Alcohol-use disorders

STUDY 2012 Alcohol screening and brief intervention in emergency departments

STUDY 2012 Alcohol screening and brief intervention in primary health care

STUDY 2013 Effectiveness of screening and brief alcohol intervention in primary care (SIPS trial): pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial

REVIEW 2012 Clinical recognition and recording of alcohol disorders by clinicians in primary and secondary care: meta-analysis

STUDY 2011 Quality concerns with routine alcohol screening in VA clinical settings

STUDY 2010 Improving lifestyle and risk perception through patient involvement in nurse-led cardiovascular risk management: a cluster-randomized controlled trial in primary care

STUDY 2014 The effectiveness of alcohol screening and brief intervention in emergency departments: a multicentre pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial

STUDY 2012 Usefulness of brief intervention for patients admitted to emergency services for acute alcohol intoxication

REVIEW 2008 Meta-analysis: Are 3 questions enough to detect unhealthy alcohol use?