Planned and unplanned discharge from alcohol services in Scotland, 2004–2008
Effectiveness bank home page. Opens new windowResearch analysis

This entry is our analysis of a study added to the Effectiveness Bank. The original study was not published by Findings; click Title to order a copy. Free reprints may be available from the authors – click prepared e-mail. The summary conveys the findings and views expressed in the study.

Links to other documents. Hover over for notes. Click to highlight passage referred to. Unfold extra text Unfold supplementary text
Copy title and link | Comment/query |

Planned and unplanned discharge from alcohol services in Scotland, 2004–2008.

Newham R., Russell C., Davies J.B.
Alcohol and Alcoholism: 2010, 45(1), p. 64–69.
Unable to obtain a copy by clicking title? Try asking the author for a reprint by adapting this prepared e-mail or by writing to Dr Newham at You could also try this alternative source.

In the mid-2000s over 50% of terminated alcohol treatment episodes in Scotland ended with the client or patient dropping out. Considerable variation between regions suggests there is room for improvement and with it improvement in the cost effectiveness of services.

Summary To gain a picture of the drop-out rate from alcohol treatment services in Scotland, researchers contacted all 21 drug and alcohol action teams in the country and sent a request for the required information. These multi-agency partnerships coordinate services in a local area including inpatient services and community-based specialist nursing and counselling services both public sector and not-for-profit. The same request was sent to 63 alcohol treatment services randomly sampled from those listed by Alcohol Focus Scotland, a national charity. For the period 1 April 2004 to 31 March 2008, discharge status data were received from 10 of the 21 partnerships which accounted for nearly two thirds of the Scottish population. Data from three of the 63 services was included in the total for their areas.

Results Across the four years, of 48,299 treatment episodes which ended (some of which would have been the same people re-entering and leaving again), 22,380 (46%) ended in a planned discharge, The client was referred on to another agency or discharged at the end of their treatment by mutual agreement. 25,231 (52%) in an unplanned discharge The client did not attend a number of assessment or treatment appointments leading agency staff to agree that they are no longer a current client. or 'drop-out', and 688 (1.4%) in a disciplinary discharge. The client was been discharged due to their misconduct.

Each year the proportion of discharges which were planned steadily increased from 42% in 2004–2005 to 52% in 2007–2008, while the unplanned discharge proportion remained roughly constant until a sharp drop from 56% in 2006–2007 to 47% in 2007–2008. The last year of the monitored period – 2007–2008 – was the only one in which planned discharges exceeded unplanned. Disciplinary discharges decreased steadily from 3% in 2004–2005 to just under 1% in 2007–2008.

There was considerable and statistically significant regional variation, ranging from Ayrshire and Arran's 68% planned discharge proportion to 26% in West Lothian. Across the four years, only four of the 10 regions reported an average planned discharge proportion exceeding 50%. While the number of treatment starts in each of the 10 areas was associated with an index of deprivation, The proportion of localities in each area were among the the top 20% of deprived localities in Scotland as defined by the Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation. there was no significant association between deprivation and the proportion of discharges which were planned.

Conclusions Over the four years drop-outs accounted for 52% of discharges, comparable to the first-month drop-out rate found by most studies included in a review published in 1992. At 46%, the average Scottish planned discharge proportion over the four years exceeded that of Wales' 40% in 2007–2008, but at 67% the USA did better than both – possibly because there some services are paid for by the client, and possibly too because UK clients have a poorer prognosis than in some other nations and in particular are more likely to be unemployed. The considerable regional variation in Scotland might be due to regional differences in how alcohol services are structured and funded. Identifying these factors should help improve the cost effectiveness of alcohol treatment services.

Last revised 22 August 2011

Open Effectiveness Bank home page

Top 10 most closely related documents on this site. For more try a subject or free text search

STUDY 2015 Navigating the alcohol treatment pathway: A qualitative study from the service users’ perspective

STUDY 2012 A pilot randomised controlled trial of brief versus twice weekly versus standard supervised consumption in patients on opiate maintenance treatment

STUDY 2011 Performance-based contracting within a state substance abuse treatment system: a preliminary exploration of differences in client access and client outcomes

STUDY 2008 Replication and sustainability of improved access and retention within the Network for the Improvement of Addiction Treatment

MATRIX CELL 2020 Effectiveness Bank Alcohol Treatment Matrix cell D2: Organisational functioning; Generic and cross-cutting issues

MATRIX CELL 2019 Alcohol Treatment Matrix cell D1: Organisational functioning; Screening and brief intervention

STUDY 2009 Relating counselor attributes to client engagement in England

STUDY 1970 Frontiers of alcoholism

STUDY 2003 Systematic but simple way to determine who needs residential care

STUDY 2003 DTTOs: the Scottish way cuts the failure rate