Botched DTTO response to crack using offenders
Effectiveness bank home page. Opens new windowResearch analysis

This entry is our account of a study selected by Drug and Alcohol Findings as particularly relevant to improving outcomes from drug or alcohol interventions in the UK. Links to other documents. Hover over for notes. Click to highlight passage referred to. Unfold extra text Unfold supplementary text

Copy title and link | Comment/query |

Botched DTTO response to crack using offenders

Most worrying of the recent crop of reports on coerced treatment in Britain was a report not released until 2007 on how in 2003 and 2004 three English DTTO teams handled their crack using caseloads.1 For two of the sites no outcome assessment was possible because the most basic of records were lacking. Though there too much data was missing, the third (in London) was able to provide records for 70 relevant offenders. At most five may (we only know the rest did not) have completed their court orders and remained free of crack or heroin use or heavy drinking.

Administrative confusion was apparent from the start when the researchers found central authorities mistakenly thought the teams saw large numbers of primary crack users. In fact there were few; even if using crack, most offenders saw themselves as primarily heroin users.

Though what happened to most of the offenders is unclear, the inflexibility of the court orders and of the treatments combined with poor management and inter-agency working suggest any successes would have been as much in spite of as because of the DTTO process Each site failed to invidualise the treatments they offered and relations between partner agencies were strained.

Staff knew things needed to change and changes were afoot. Confidence that things really did improve after the research ended is diminished by the fact that several years earlier the first DTTO schemes had suffered similar problems.2

1 Turnbull P.J. et al. Supervising crack-using offenders on drug treatment and testing orders. National Treatment Agency for Substance Misuse, 2007.

2 Ashton M. First test for the DTTO. Drug and Alcohol Findings: 2001, issue 6.

Last revised 07 January 2008

Open Effectiveness Bank home page

Top 10 most closely related documents on this site. For more try a subject or free text search

STUDY 2013 Criminal justice responses to drug related crime in Scotland

STUDY 2001 First test for the DTTO

STUDY 2001 Treatment and testing orders should make a substantial dent in drug-related social costs

STUDY 2011 The family drug and alcohol court (FDAC) evaluation project: final report

STUDY 2016 After FDAC: outcomes 5 years later (final report)

STUDY 2008 Testing children pointless but arrest referral offers early intervention opportunities

STUDY 2005 Flexible DTTOs do most to cut crime

STUDY 2012 The impact of treatment on reconviction for drug-related offences

STUDY 2009 Review of the Glasgow & Fife drug courts

STUDY 2009 The Drug Treatment Outcomes Research Study (DTORS): final outcomes report